Cost Speed & Scalability
Photochemical etching’s tooling costs represent one of the process’s most compelling advantages, with phototools typically costing anywhere from $500 to $5,000 depending on part size and complexity. This modest investment stands in stark contrast to the tooling expenses required for competing metal fabrication processes, where costs can easily reach tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. The dramatic difference in tooling investment fundamentally changes the economics of part production, making photochemical etching exceptionally attractive for prototypes, low to medium volume production, and applications where design flexibility and rapid iteration provide strategic value.
Understanding the complete picture of tooling costs across different manufacturing processes enables informed decision-making about process selection, helps establish realistic project budgets, and reveals why photochemical etching has become the preferred choice for countless applications where traditional high-tooling processes would be economically prohibitive or strategically disadvantageous.
Phototools serve as the “tooling” for photochemical etching, created photographically from CAD data using high-resolution imaging equipment that produces precise patterns on photographic film or glass plates. For typical parts ranging from a few square inches to sheet-sized layouts, phototool costs generally fall between $500 and $3,000. Small, simple parts at the lower end of this range require minimal imaging area and straightforward patterns, while large, complex parts approaching full sheet size with extremely fine features may reach the upper end.
Glass phototools, offering enhanced durability, dimensional stability, and longer service life compared to film phototools, typically cost 50% to 100% more than film equivalents but remain inexpensive compared to hard tooling. Even premium glass phototools for demanding applications rarely exceed $10,000 per set, and most fall well below this threshold.
The low absolute cost of phototools creates several strategic advantages. First, the tooling investment for even a small prototype run of 10 to 50 parts remains manageable, often under $2,000 total. Second, design changes require only new phototools, not expensive die modifications, encouraging optimization and iteration. Third, producing multiple design variations simultaneously on a single sheet for testing and comparison adds minimal incremental cost. Fourth, the low tooling cost makes photochemical etching viable for custom, one-off, or limited-production specialty parts that would be economically impossible with high-tooling processes.
Stamping dies represent the opposite end of the tooling cost spectrum, with even relatively simple progressive dies typically starting at $15,000 to $30,000 for straightforward parts with a few features. As complexity increases with more features, tighter tolerances, multiple forming operations, or challenging materials, die costs escalate rapidly. Moderately complex parts commonly require dies costing $40,000 to $80,000. Highly complex parts with numerous features, precise tolerances, deep draws, or multiple forming stages can drive die costs to $100,000, $200,000, or even higher.
These dies require precision machining of hardened tool steel components including punches, dies, strippers, and guides. Die design involves substantial engineering effort developing strip layouts, calculating bend allowances, and optimizing forming sequences. After machining, dies undergo heat treatment, assembly, and extensive tryout where the die is installed in a press and debugged through iterative adjustments until acceptable parts emerge. This entire process typically spans 8 to 16 weeks or longer for complex dies.
Die maintenance adds ongoing costs throughout the production life. Punches and dies wear progressively, requiring periodic sharpening, replacement of worn components, and dimensional verification to maintain part quality. Die storage between production runs, die repairs after damage, and eventual die refurbishment or replacement all contribute to total lifecycle tooling costs that extend far beyond initial die purchase.
For high-volume production measured in hundreds of thousands or millions of parts, these die costs amortize to pennies or fractions of pennies per part, making stamping economically attractive at scale. However, for prototypes, small batches, or moderate production volumes, the tooling investment creates a massive barrier. A $50,000 die adds $5,000 per part to a 10-piece prototype run, or $50 per part to a 1,000-piece production run, often exceeding the combined cost of material and press time.
Wire electrical discharge machining for through-cutting applications uses continuously fed wire as the “tooling,” with the wire itself relatively inexpensive at $0.10 to $0.50 per foot depending on wire diameter and material. However, the machine time required represents the dominant cost, with complex parts potentially requiring many hours of processing. Sinker EDM, used for cavity forming, requires custom graphite or copper electrodes machined to the desired cavity shape. These electrodes can cost $1,000 to $10,000 or more depending on complexity and precision requirements, though still substantially less than stamping dies.
Laser cutting requires no part-specific tooling, with the laser beam itself serving as the “tool.” This creates zero tooling cost in the traditional sense, giving laser cutting an apparent advantage over photochemical etching. However, this comparison overlooks several considerations. First, laser cutting requires programming time to develop tool paths, set cutting parameters, and optimize processing. Second, for quantity production, laser cutting’s sequential nature where the beam must trace each feature individually means processing time scales linearly with quantity and complexity, while photochemical etching’s simultaneous processing of entire sheets means time and cost scale primarily with sheet count rather than feature count.
For very simple parts in small quantities, laser cutting’s zero tooling cost provides an advantage. For complex parts with many features or moderate quantities, photochemical etching’s modest tooling cost amortizes to negligible per-part contributions while the simultaneous processing creates time and cost advantages that more than offset the phototool investment.
CNC machining of sheet metal parts requires fixturing to hold thin, flexible sheets during cutting operations. Custom fixtures might cost $500 to $5,000 depending on complexity, competitive with photochemical etching phototools. However, machining thin sheets presents substantial challenges including workholding difficulties, vibration and chatter, and long cycle times for complex profiles. The programming time and machine time typically make machining uneconomical compared to photochemical etching for sheet metal components, regardless of tooling cost comparisons.
Waterjet cutting, like laser cutting, requires no part-specific tooling beyond programming, creating zero hard tooling costs. The process cuts parts by directing a high-pressure stream of water mixed with abrasive particles through the material. For very simple geometries and small quantities, waterjet offers quick turnaround without tooling investment. However, edge quality, tolerance capability, and processing speed typically favor photochemical etching for parts requiring precision, fine features, or quantities beyond single digits.
The tooling cost hierarchy fundamentally shapes process selection strategies. Photochemical etching occupies a unique position with modest tooling costs that are low enough to make prototypes and small batches economically viable, yet capable of producing highly complex parts where stamping dies would be prohibitively expensive even at high volumes. This combination of reasonable tooling costs with excellent scalability, geometric freedom, and precision positions photochemical etching as the optimal choice for a remarkably broad range of applications spanning prototypes through sustained production.
The ability to invest $2,000 in phototools rather than $50,000 in stamping dies transforms project economics, enables rapid design iteration, reduces financial risk, and accelerates product development in ways that provide competitive advantages extending far beyond simple cost savings.
4020 Jeffrey Blvd. | BUFFALO, NY 14219
P: (716) 821-9393 / (800) 875-1093
Website by Luminus
